Most conservatives have either seen in person, or read from a reliable source, just how easily liberals can be frightened, intimidated, or in this case, downright “terrified” over words and deeds that are in reality, quite harmless. Continue reading “Maine Democrat ‘Terrified’ After Seeing Man with a Hand in his Pocket”
In true liberal fashion, foul-mouthed leftie internet trolls have attacked professional golfer and fitness model Alexis “Lexi” Thompson for the high crime of playing a round of golf with President Trump and radio personality Rush Limbaugh. Continue reading “Liberal Hate: Pro Golfer Lexi Thompson to Quit Social Media for Playing a Round with Pres. Trump, Rush Limbaugh”
As the old saying goes, if you lay with dogs, don’t be surprised if you come down with fleas.
That particular bit of wisdom very well could be a reference directed to Vanessa Wruble, co-foundress of the 2017 Women’s March, long since nicknamed “The Pussyhat March”.
As reported by The New York Times, Vanessa Wruble, formerly with the Women’s March organization, is now claiming that the reason she was dumped from the gyno-group is due to her Jewish heritage.
In the never-ending parade of absurd neo-lib nuttiness, an institute for higher learning in the Wolverine State will be arming teachers and staff in case of a crazed shooter scenario.
However, the goombas calling the shots as Oakland University in suburban Detroit won’t be issuing handguns, long guns, flame throwers, Claymore mines, or even Claymore swords.
No, these geniuses will be handing out nearly a thousand hockey pucks to OU professors.
To add to the overall stupidity of this decision, the Chief of Police for OU approves of fighting firearms with a half-pound of Vulcanized rubber.
A rather innocuous sign post has some residents of the hyper-politically correct town of Beaverton, Oregon, clutching at non-existant pearls, while miraculously wringing their hands at the same time.
As seen by a handful of residents in the Portland suburb, a non-descript piece of white paper using a rather unremarkable font plainly states, “IT’S OKAY TO BE WHITE”.
Predictably, as our British friends say, some of the Beavertonians are in a bit of a strop.
Are there no depths that the Leftists won’t sink to in their attacks against President Trump? Obviously not.
As just about everyone already knows, the plane carrying the First Lady to Philadelphia had to return to Joint Base Andrews (Maryland) shortly after take-off due to the cabin briefly filling with smoke.
Other than the FLOTUS and flight crew, there were also a number of Secret Service agents and members of the press corps aboard the flight.
Nonetheless, Leftists have crawled out of their collective holes to wish nothing but evil should befall Mrs. Trump.
Killjoys are everywhere. Especially when it comes down to those cranky and politically correct SJWs.
Case in point is USA Today reporter Nancy Armour. In a recent article, the alleged journalist has her skivvies in a knot over, get ready for this, “No place in the NFL for cheerleaders in 2018“.
As she penned her anger specifically at the NFL’s Houston Texans;
The Houston Texans aren’t even bothering with the pretense.
On their website is a photo gallery of the finalists from
last weekend’s cheerleader tryouts, and visitors are encouraged to vote for their
favorites. Are these action shots of the women that highlight their athletic ability or dance skills? Do they include a list of their qualifications?
Of course not. They’re headshots. Sorry, head and chest shots. Close-up ones, at that.
The better to ogle, you know.
This is undoubtedly the offending Houston Texans cheerleaders website. And yes, Armour correctly cites that the Texans are requesting the fans to vote for their favorite.
Hey Nanc, a few things I’d like to point out to you;
- No one forced any of these women to sign-on as cheerleaders
- It’s a fair bet that nearly every one of them consider their stint in the NFL as a plus on their resume, hopeful of a future career as a choreographer, model, university cheer coach or aspiring actress
- Who are you to deny these women their shot at empowering themselves?
Speaking strictly for myself, I’d much rather ogle at these hotties than being forced to look at you dried-up, wrinkly, weathered and crusty… journalism diploma.
Again, speaking strictly for myself, I’m still debating if I’ll cast my ballot for Sierra of Baytown, TX or Victoria of Houston.
To be perfectly honest, none of these would-be cheerleaders are particularly all that busty. That kinda pokes a hole in Armour’s balloon.
So why is she trying so hard to screw-up their shot at success? Some people aren’t happy unless their bitchy.
Crazy Nancy Pelosi just may be on to something when she compared Trump tax cut-fueled $1,000 bonus checks to mere “crumbs.”
After all, Pelosi is the richest women in both houses of Congress.
Her estimated worth? A cool $43.4 million according to OpenSecrets.com.
So maybe a thousand clams really is nothing more than just pocket change to the likes of Pelosi and the rest of her Limousine Liberal pals.
But for a better idea of what exactly Joe and Jane Lunchbox have to deal with living in the Soviet Socialist Golden State, a recent report from KABC-TV (Los Angeles) paints a much gloomier picture than the vast majority of Americans could never imagine their hometown.
With San Jose located at the tail-end of California’s famed (and über-expensive) Silicon Valley, the city named in honor of Saint Joseph is literately just down the road from Pelosi’s 12th Congressional District.
As KABC cited;
An uninhabitable burned-out home in San Jose went up for sale at the price of $800,000.
While it may sound crazy, there are people willing to pay. A realtor said in less than 24 hours, 10 potential buyers contacted her. She anticipates selling it in a few days.
So what’s the reason for the high interest? Buying the charred home and rebuilding on the property is a lot cheaper than buying a brand new home in Silicon Valley.
As one of the studio anchors noted at the end of the video report;
“That is a testament to what’s going on in the state of California…”
As the ancient myth goes, that über-doofus Pandora really screwed things when she busted open Zeus’s wedding present. Goofy chick just couldn’t keep well enough alone.
Quicker than Sonny Corleone could say “Badda-boop, badda-beep, badda-bang“, Pandora released the following evils upon humanity;
- Old age
Much like Pandora, liberals present-day either don’t think things through to their logical conclusion, or are under the misconception that actions don’t have consequences.
For the sake of argument, let’s assume that the Loony Left gets their wish — no more border control.
Now it’s time for the next obvious sequential step — we have the moral obligation to “spread around the wealth” as Barack Obama once famously proclaimed.
According to who specifically are we Americans under any type of “moral obligation” to spread our nation’s wealth to those here not only illegally, but also for those considered poor?
I’ll tell you who they are;
- The liberal media
- The liberal politicians
- The liberal acedemics
- The liberal clerics
I’ll even give examples. As self-admitted liberal Peter Beinart of The Atlantic magazine wrote in the summer of 2017 edition;
Entry to the United States is, for starters, a boon to immigrants and to the family members back home to whom they send money. It should be valued on these moral grounds alone.
Liberals must take seriously Americans’ yearning for social cohesion. To promote both mass immigration and greater economic redistribution, they must convince more native-born white Americans that immigrants will not weaken the bonds of national identity.
Then there’s the everything medical and health news service MedicalXpress.com in regards to Obama’s Affordable Care Act, and the opinions of Associate Professor Patricia Illingworth (medical and business ethics, as well as health policy and bioethics and the law) and Professor Wendy E. Parmet (health, disability and public health law) both of Northeastern University;
Calling it a “moral obligation” and a “global public good,” Illingworth and Parmet suggest that healthcare is a human rights issue, and that extending coverage in the U.S. to non-citizens could actually alleviate both the cost and care burdens on everyone. In fact, the researchers co-authored a book on the subject, The Health of Newcomers: Immigration, Health Policy, and the Case for Global Solidarity, that ties together their expertise—Illingworth, professor of philosophy and fellow at the Carr Center for Human Rights at Harvard University; and Parmet, the Matthews Distinguished University Professor of Law.
And as penned by Adam Lee of the religion-centered Patheos;
On a first pass, it’s hard to see what argument could be made against open borders. Shouldn’t travel be a basic human right? (It is, according to the United Nations.) Why shouldn’t I, or any human being, be able to move freely and to live wherever I choose? It strikes me as indefensible – another form of segregation, really – to say that there are some parts of the planet where I can never go, just because of where I was born.
OK, I get it. Free everything to whoever is categorized as poor or low income. So who exactly are the poor and low income people of the world that have a right to everything American?
According to a report by the Pew Research Center regarding personal income across the globe, per person;
- Poor (living on $2 or less daily)
- Low income ($2.01-$10 a day)
- Middle income ($10.01-$20 a day)
- Upper-middle income ($20.01-$50)
- High income (more than $50)
Keep in mind that globally a “poor” singular person is a yearly income of no greater than $730. ($2 a day X 365 days per year = $730).
Again, according to Pew, this is the percentage of who falls into which category;
- Poor – 15%
- Low income – 56%
- Middle income – 13%
- Upper middle – 9%
- High income – 7%
According to the Pew global guide, a single person who subsists on $33.26 is nearly smack-dab in the middle of the “upper middle income” category. Annually, that person makes $12,140.
Know what else the total of $12,400 is? It’s the Federal Poverty Line. So as far as the world is concerned, their upper middle income is our poverty-stricken.
But back the status of the world’s less fortunate. The total percentage of the world that makes less than the American Federal Poverty Level (the poor, low income, and middle income according to Pew) comes to 84% of the human population of planet Earth.
The global population is approximately 7,613,100,000. Eighty four percent of that total is 6,395,004,000
Forget about the 1,500 “caravan” of wannabe illegals from Central America.
You ready for almost six and a half billion?
Imagine that… conservatives are more likely to be revolted by smelly hippies than their liberal brethren.
In a surprise to no one, a university study has determined that those disgusted by the odiferous funk of the Great Unwashed are much more likely to lean to the political right as well as being in favor of secure borders.
As it turns out, there’s a very good reason why certain individuals have a deeply embedded in their DNA an aversion to those who emanate a fetid scent. Specifically, the smell of body odor, urine, bad breath, feces, etc.
Not only did Victoria Friedman of Breitbart.com (London edition) report that conservatives are grossed-out by the stench of the perpetually scuzzy, but gag-inducingly enough, its been determined that “left-wingers were less revolted by bad personal hygiene”.
According to research conducted at the University of Stockholm, Sweden;
Researchers theorise a correlation between how test subjects wanted the world to be ordered and the rates of levels of disgust to bad breath, smelly feet, urine, faeces, sweat, and flatulence.
The more a person disliked bad smells, the greater they agreed with statements such as the need to trust “the proper authorities”, need a “mighty leader”, and want to ignore “noisy rabble-rousers”.
Regarding why any person with a wit of sense would be repulsed by those who happily wallow in their own filth, the brainiacs at the University of Stockholm concluded;
Psychologists believe that it represents a deep-rooted “defence mechanism” against contagious diseases.
Perhaps proving that everything old is new again, reporter Friedman also cited a Royal Society paper initially published in 2011 entitled “Why disgust matters”.
Notable of the numerous (and simply fascinating) references in the paper is a quote from molecular biologist, philosopher and bioethicist Dr. Leon R. Kass, who famously stated;
There is ‘wisdom in repugnance’. Moral disgust is one of the major positive forces that builds, maintains and polices the cooperative societies in which we have to live to thrive. Understanding disgust’s part in the morality puzzle remains a major task for social scientists—one that could offer important cues for the ways in which we make social policy.
Just don’t tell Democrats. They’ll demand a safe space.
There’s just no getting around it, Taylor Swift is a doll.
But with her wholesome, All-American good looks aside, Swift has yet another super-power that very few possess – the ability to simultaneously send liberals up a wall while being just as sugary as all the sweet tea in South Carolina.
As reported by Breitbart.com;
Pop star Taylor Swift apparently struck a nerve with leftists and Internet trolls this week after she said she “couldn’t have asked for a better year” in 2017 and thanked her fans in a birthday Instagram post.
“I love you guys so much,” Swift captioned a photo taken at a recent London concert. “I couldn’t have asked for a better year, all thanks to you. Thanks for all the birthday wishes. Can’t wait to see what 28 will be like. See you on tour.”
That simple message was apparently too much for some Twitter users — and at least a few media outlets — who questioned how Swift could have a “great year” with all the tragedy occurring in the world, including the election of President Donald Trump.
is there anything more annoying than Taylor Swift talking about what a great year 2017 has been while everyone else is fighting for our lives under Trump? ugh…
— Kevin Allred (@KevinAllred) December 14, 2017
I mean, yeah there were Nazi’s and white supremacy marches, and families are being town apart, and there were mass shootings, and people are losing health care, but none of that affects me, so 2017 was great!
— Rich E (@kaspe_r11) December 14, 2017
However, Swift does have her fans who don’t mind standing-up for her;
Maybe Taylor Swift had the best year of her life b/c she won a sexual assault case in court, released an album that broke records, & is in love. Maybe it’s because last year everyone said she was “Over” & instead She rose out of the hate like a Phoenix.
— David Rutz (@DavidRutz) December 16, 2017
Why are you so upset at someone else’s happiness?
— Georgia (@CSE_Survivor) December 15, 2017
There were even a couple of Swift defenders that landed a handful of well-aimed haymakers at the liberal crybabies;
Meanwhile in socialist Venezuela they are standing in daily food lines 1km long with the highest murder and inflation rates in the world. But please do tell us more about your brave "fight". pic.twitter.com/LUxlzGnLsk
— Todd Kron (@Toddkron) December 15, 2017
— Todd Kron (@Toddkron) December 15, 2017
“Fighting for our lives” under Trump. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂pic.twitter.com/htu3pM3ZGB
— BuckInTennessee (@BuckInTennessee) December 15, 2017
Babies were born in 2017. People beat cancer in 2017. Children were adopted into forever homes in 2017. For the first time in a family’s history, a young person graduated from college in 2017. Americans gave $390Bil to charity in 2017. Life is more than the sum of our politics.
— Jeremy Randolph (@jeremyjrandolph) December 16, 2017
In the highest (lowest) traditions of liberal media hacks, they’ve collectively launched personal attacks against Melania Trump and her choices of how to decorate the Executive Mansion during this Nativity Season.
As cited below on her official Twitter account appropriately tagged @FLOTUS, Mrs. Trump displayed to the nation and the world what her office described in a press release as a decorative scheme designed by the First Lady herself “‘with a nod to tradition’ and paying ‘respect to 200 years of holiday traditions at the White House.'”
— Melania Trump (@FLOTUS) November 27, 2017
With it ostensibly understood that certain hard-core haters would attack the Trump family regardless of the circumstances, what came as a mild surprise was not only the Establishment Media giving Twitter trolls credibility by covering their anonymous swipes at Mrs. Trump as somehow “newsworthy”, but they’ve also decided to personally cast aspersions not only on Melania, but on Christmas itself.
As the San Francisco Chronicle allegedly “reported” along with publishing the insults themselves;
Social media is mocking a photo display of White House holiday decorations that some say look rather haunting.
While most of the decorations appear traditional, one hallway has a more modern, stark display. The First Lady’s Director of Communications Stephanie Grisham also sent out a tweet with the image of the hallway decorations that many are deeming eerie and spooky and better suited to Halloween than Christmas.
One Twitter user pointed out that the dimly lit hallway lined with dead branches painted white looks like the perfect spot to tape a “Stranger Things” scene.
Another took the shadowy image and Photoshopped in Jack Skellington.
I wasn’t sure whether Melania’s White House Christmas decorations were more Pan’s Labyrinth, It, or Stranger Things, so I combined them all. pic.twitter.com/FKkcVHcxlM
— Parker Molloy (@ParkerMolloy) November 27, 2017
But on the other side of the coin, the conservative-leaning Washington Free Beacon cited a handful of cheap-shot artists working for fashion magazines who decided to join in on the liberal hatefest;
The media is attacking First Lady Melania Trump for her White House Christmas decorations, comparing Mrs. Trump to an evil “ice queen” and criticizing her for wearing a coat while she helped decorate a tree.
The fashion world had a different reaction to the Obamas final Christmas decoration display at the White House, which included giant stuffed animals of the Obama dogs and puerile snowmen.
“The Obamas have set the bar high for holiday decorating; future First Families have big shoes to fill,” wrote Harpers Bazaar. The fashion magazine was awestruck by “friendly snowmen” “adorably dressed in earmuffs and scarves,” and said a foyer in the White House was “perfectly decorated.”
The magazine singled out “notable pieces of décor,” such as the “super-sized stuffed toy replicas of the Obamas’ dogs Sunny and Bo,” which were especially terrifying given Sunny’s penchant for mauling young girls and defecating in the White House.
Harpers Bazaar had no such praise for the decorations this year. Instead, the magazine criticized Melania for wearing an off-the-shoulder coat while decorating a Christmas tree, and piled on a
Twitter meme that compared the decorations in the East Colonnade to scenes in horror films.
“Twitter really doesn’t like the White House Christmas decorations,” wrote Harpers Bazaar, adding, “It’s been described as a ‘house of horrors.'”
The hallway is lined with tall “glistening wintry branches,” and leads to a Christmas tree that pays tribute to Gold Star families with star ornaments.
Vogue also used the display as an opportunity to attack the Trump White House. The fashion magazine criticized the decorations as being “very, very white,” and evoking an “apocalyptic, barren landscape similar to what some of us imagine lies in America’s future, or the calming white walls of a mental institution.”
Numerous mainstream media outlets wrote the same story. The New Yorker called Melania a “wicked queen,” Elle UK said she decorated the White House “like a nightmare,” while the Daily Beast headlined its story, “Step Inside Melania Trump’s Nightmare Before Christmas.”
Valerie Plame may have once claimed that it was evil Republicans that illegally outed her as an undercover CIA operative (she wasn’t, she was openly employed as a desk jockey working in Langley), but the same Valerie Plame is having a rough go of it explaining her retweet of a call to place “warning labels” on America’s Jews. Continue reading “Obama’s Valarie Plame retweets ‘Jews are Rats’ Article”
Tomi Lehren has been described a number of different ways; a breath of fresh air to the conservative blogosphere, a fearless truth teller long overdue within the conservative blogosphere, arguably the most lusted after personality inhabiting the conservative blogosphere. They all work. Continue reading “Tomi Lahren slams liberals for defending ‘Rapeugees’”
Remember when Michelle Obama recently waved her bear clawish manhands around, pointing her kielbasa-like fingers at Trump voters everywhere, telling the world, “When they go low, we go high”? Continue reading “Liberal hypocrisy: The children may have watched, but now they’re listening”
Quite possibly to the chagrin of the Gun Controller-in-Chief, the latest run on gun stores aren’t coming from the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy, but from his very own Progressive ilk. Continue reading “Liberals freak out; prep for ‘Trumpocalypse’ – cling to guns, pussy cats”
There was a time in her life when young Jackie Evancho was invited to sing for Barack Obama. No. Make that twice. Continue reading “Libs attack 16-yr-old girl who will sing National Anthem at Trump inauguration”
Fidel Castro held quite a few formal titles: El Presidente, El Comandante, and El Primero. Now the only title he holds is sólo otro matón comunista muerto. Continue reading “Castro: Liberals Throw their LGBT Allies Under the Bus”
No sanctuary for those killed by illegals…
Much like a child holding his breath during a temper tantrum, a small number of Democrat governed cities still stinging from Donald Trump’s presidential victory are proudly proclaiming their status as sanctuary cities for millions of illegal aliens. Continue reading “Sanctuary Cities: The Cost to the American Taxpayers”
As Merriam-Webster and every high school kid whose ever boned up for the SAT verbal knows, Sycophant is defined as a person who praises powerful people in order to get their approval or as a person best described as a servile self-seeking flatterer.
Possibly the words Works for Hillary should be added to this particular noun normally reserved for toadies, parasites and suck-ups.
As for the “Caveman” reference, that was my call sign in the Corps. With that said, I do ask that after viewing the below video that liberals don’t freak out, anti-gun nuts don’t go into melt-down, and that militant atheists go on a screed. Continue reading “A Retired Marine’s 12 Days of Christmas – NSFD (Not Safe For Democrats)”
If you live in a country where professional athletes are ordered to surrender their blood, but an ex-Secretary of State boldly refuses to surrender 60,000 government documents… you might be an American.
If you live in a country where Chaplains in the Armed Forces are ordered to never utter the name of Jesus Christ, but an Army Major slaughters 14 innocent people while screaming “Allahu Akbar!”… you might be an American.
Communist leaders have long been known to be enamored by the sound of their own voices. The likes of Leonid Brezhnev, the Castro Brothers, Josef Stalin, Hugo Chávez, Erich Honecker and a veritable constellation of other red stars have made a name for themselves for long winded speeches that would last for hours upon hours. Chairman of the Communist Party USA John Bachtell has also illustrated that the collectivist inkwell is not only deep, but also leans hard in favor of Team Obama.
Never one to be confused as a foaming-at-the-mouth right winger (such as myself) author and professional student DaShanne Stokes once correctly stated, “People often call fighting discrimination being ‘PC’ because they don’t want their own unearned privileges challenged.” Or as the late and great Major Gene Duncan, USMC of Fiction and Fact From Dunk’s Almanac Old-fashioned Observations for the Modern Military Leader fame once penned, “All this tact and diplomacy has made liars of us all.”
Is the leather vested Hells Angels next…?
Eastern Michigan University (EMU) has reportedly hosted controversial animal activist Gary Yourofsky to lecture young minds on the moral evils of eating meat and other food products such as yogurt and eggs, as reported by the right-of-center news portal Front Page Magazine on Nov. 11, 2013.
Not released to the general public until after the fact, Yourofsky spoke before a EMU Sociology 101 class in which he equated the consumption of animals and animal-products to that of engaging in sexual congress with beasts:
Is bestiality weird to you? Doing sexual things with animals?
Because I used to think everybody thought so, but not even close, my meat, cheese, and egg-loving friends, because you engage in carnivorous bestiality on a daily basis.