When did ‘Nationalism,’ ‘Alt-Right’ and ‘Populism’ become dirty words?

Nationalists.

Without fail, within five minutes of reading or viewing any of the Establishment Media outlets, you’ll be told that the words “nationalist,” alt-right” or “populist” are somehow on the same level as 40-grit toilet paper or the upside of necrophilia.

Needless to say, this is just another example of the MSM strong-arming us to accepting their definitions.

Rest assured, not only will I not break… I refuse to bend, even a little. So while the likes of the New York Times, CNN, etc, do their best to be the Language Gestapo, let’s break-down what these words really mean.

Alt-Right.

Nationalism – According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary: loyalty and devotion to a nation; especially : a sense of national consciousness exalting one nation above all others and placing primary emphasis on promotion of its culture and interests as opposed to those of other nations.

Sounds to me like good old-fashioned patriotism, political correctness be damned.

Alt-Right – There is no textbook definition for this word, but know this has nothing to do with Skinheads, the KKK, Nazis or eugenics. After all, the Democrats have cornered the market on eugenics, and when it comes to squashing free speech they certainly give Skinheads, the KKK, and Nazis a run for their money.

Anyhow, the term alt-right was coined in 2008 by philosopher, historian, and columnist Paul Gottfried when he described conservatives who not only rejected totalitarian, big-government Democrats (think Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer), but also in rejecting totalitarian, big-government Republicans (think Lindsay Graham and John McCain).

In its original meaning, alt-right is synonymous with independent conservative or conservatarian.

Personally speaking, alt-righters like me stand against RINOs, The Deep State, and The Swamp. Just like how my president stands against them.

Populism – Again, according to Merriam-Webster: a member of a political party claiming to represent the common people; a believer in the rights, wisdom, or virtues of the common people.

Kind of like the Founding Fathers, huh?

Populist.

Globalist Backstabber: The Legacy of George W. Bush

For the eight long years of the presidency of Barack Hussein Obama, George W. Bush was consistently hammered by both Obama and his ever-loyal Ministry of Propaganda (CNN, NY Times, NBC, etc) as either a bumbling fool with the intelligence (and mannerisms to match) of a baboon, or as some type of evil genius responsible for death, destruction and the shredding of civil liberties from the Euphrates River to Guantanamo Bay to Anytown, USA.

And the whole time Dubya kept his mouth shut. Every Obama failure… every Obama misstep… every time Obama embarrassed himself and this nation, the blame for reliably laid at the feet of the former Texas governor.

Instead of even a minimal defence of his presidency or even himself as a man, Bush remained silent to the Obama insults while he kept himself busy with long-distance bicycle rides with veterans or by painting portraits of the same vets he ordered to war.

Even when Obama ordered a unilateral withdrawal from Iraq in 2009, Bush remained silent.

Even with Iraqi cities and towns such as Fallujah, Mosul, Ramadi and Tikrit began falling to the radical Islamist jihadists of ISIS, Bush remained silent.

Even when it became painfully obvious to even the most partisan of political hacks that the over 4,000 dead and tens of thousands of wounded American kids who were fed into the meatgrinder was all in vain, Bush remained silent.

Even with the likes of the Battle of Fallujah, the Battle of Tikrit, etc, being written in American blood into the annals of the Marine Corps and the Army, Bush remained silent.

Fast forward to present day. Nine short months into the Trump presidency, George W. Bush has decided to speak up. Who does he attack? You guessed it – President Trump.

So what was Bush’s reward for defending globalism and never ending military intervention overseas?

The reliable mouthpieces of globalism and never ending military intervention overseas, The New Yorker and NPR have deigned to pronounce Dubya as an “elder statesman”.

Quite different from the branding of him as drooling mouth breather out to destroy the Constitution, and more than worthy of impeachment, huh?