(VIDEO) Happy to See Lefties Are Taking RBG’s Death So Well


WARNING: Foul language alert.

Is it just me, or does this chick sound a lot like Chris Farley’s character of Matt Foley? You know… the guy who lives in a van down by the river.

Keep iun mind that while in full meltdown, this Karen is behind the wheel of a couple tons of steel, apparently rolling down the highway at about 65 mph.

But with all seriousness aside, if the Left can impeach President Trump during an election year, he certainly can nominate someone to the Supreme Court during an election year.

After all, it was Ginsburg who once famously stated;

Allow me to also state that I could no more “celebrate” the life of Ginsburg any more than I could “celebrate” the life of any other person with the blood of millions of unborn children on their hands.

“There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the president stops being president in his last year.”

Granted, Ginsburg was referring to the 2018 Barack Obama nomination of Judge Merrick Garland, yet somehow, Democrats conveniently forget that this particular sword cuts both ways.

RGB Watch: Any Public ‘Proof of Life’?

Sleeping when the SCOTUS is in session is more dangerous
than anything President Trump has ever been accused of.

The Supreme Court may be Ruthless…

We’re going on the third month since Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has been seen by the American people.

The former lawyer for the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) was last seen in public back on Dec. 6, 2018. Since then, not so much. Continue reading “RGB Watch: Any Public ‘Proof of Life’?”

Ginsburg ignores the judicial women who sided with ‘the five male justices’

Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg,_SCOTUS_photo_portrait

“A wise old woman and a wise old man will reach the same conclusion.” – Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, 1991

Despite nominees to the third branch of government consistently testifying before Senate confirmation hearings promising in their most convincing voice that they could separate their personal feelings from the legal facts placed before them when it came to rendering decisions, Justice Ginsburg may have tipped her hand concerning the hot-button topic of gender politics. As reported by Yahoo! News on July 31, 2014, and also by the Cybercast News Service on Aug. 1, 2014, Ginsburg more than slightly alluded that due to gender, the five male justices who formed the majority opinion in the recent Hobby Lobby case are somehow incapable of rendering a correct judicial decision regarding members of the opposite sex. Continue reading “Ginsburg ignores the judicial women who sided with ‘the five male justices’”