BRITISH SNOWFLAKES: CAPITAL LETTERS MAY SCARE STUDENTS INTO FAILURE

IF YOU SHOULD HAPPEN TO BE A BRITISH SNOWFLAKE BETA MALE, I CERTAINLY HOPE MY USE OF ONLY CAPITAL LETTERS NOT ONLY TRIGGERS YOU, BUT ALSO SENDS YOU SCURRYING TO YOUR SAFE SPACE.

BUT IN ALL FAIRNESS, I’M GOING SOLEY ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE STAFF OF ONE OF BRITAIN’S LEADING INSTITUTES OF HIGHER LEARNING. AND I DON’T MEAN ONE OF THOSE NAMBY-PAMBY LONDONTOWNE SCHOOLS

I’M TALKING ABOUT LEEDS TRINITY UNIVERSITY. YES, THAT LEEDS. WORKING-CLASS LEEDS. THE LEEDS RHINKOS. THE WHO LIVE AT LEEDS.

Flocons de neige britanniques.

Now, back to at least a bit of reality for us regular people.

As reported by Will Metcalfe of Yahoo News UK, in a memo from the staff of Leeds Trinity’s journalism department, lecturers need to refrain from “writing to students using capital letters…”

Rationale? All caps just may “‘scare them into failure’ and instead suggested using a ‘friendly tone’ and avoiding the use of negative language.”

Also noted;

Critics have since slammed the memo, saying it is just aiding to the ‘snowflake’ generation being overindulged throughout their education – following incidents in Manchester and Kent.

The memo said: ‘Despite our best attempts to explain assessment tasks, any lack of clarity can generate anxiety and even discourage students from attempting the assessment at all.’

The Express reports that it goes on to say writing words in capital letters could make the assignment appear ‘more difficult’ – adding to anxieties.

A spokesperson for Leeds Trinity said the memo was guidance on how to explain tasks to students so they achieve their full potential.

The move is the latest in a string of incidents which have seen universities criticised for pandering to students.

The University of Manchester’s students’ union replaced applause with ‘jazz hands’ at one event to alleviate stress among the anxious and people with sensory issues.

Kent University last month was criticised for banning students wearing ‘offensive’ costumes, including cowboy outfits or sombreros, in case it affected students’ right to a ‘safe space’ at the institution.




Aussie ‘sexuality expert’: Babies should give consent to having filthy diapers changed

It doesn’t ever end, does it? First we had to deal with the image of Barry Hussein Obama’s “Pajama Boy” hawking health care paid for by someone else. By the way, if your adult son still wears a onesie, you’ve got bigger problems than health insurance for junior.

Anyhow, not long thereafter, the world had the cuck-friendly version of “Baby, It’s Cold Outside” forced on us. Remember the cringe-worthy lyrics?

Her: I ought to say no, no, no

Him: You reserve the right to say no.

Her: At least I’m gonna say that I tried.

Him: You reserve the right to say no.



Now comes word from Down Under that if (maybe the dingo ate) your baby had the bad manners to squeeze out a massive steamer into their nappie, you better get baby’s permission first before changing that same stanky diaper.

As reported by Breitbart.com;

‘Sexuality expert’ and author Deanne Carson has attracted mass ridicule after suggesting babies should “give consent” to having their nappies/diapers changed by their parents.

Speaking to ABC News (Australia), Carson was asked what age clients she works with.

She replied: “We work with children from three years old, we work with parents from birth”.

“From birth?” the host responds, to which Carson smugly retorts:

“Yeah, just about how to set up a culture of consent in their homes. So, ‘I’m going to change your nappy now, is that ok?’

“Of course the baby isn’t going to respond, ‘Yes mum that’s awesome, I’d love to have my nappy changed’. But if you leave a space and wait for body language and wait to make eye contact then you’re letting that child know that their response matters”.

Just one question for this dimwit; if your infant is that damn smart as to give you non-verbal permission to change their crap-filled diaper, shouldn’t that very same booger-eater be whip-smart enough not to have shat themselves to begin with?

Just a thought…