The Woke Eats Themselves – Why Britain’s Supreme Court Ruled that Only Women are Women

What were you praying about?

Only a fleeting moment of sanity…

For those who follow politics on the other side of the Atlantic, many already are aware that the British Supreme Court (UKSC) just ruled that “woman” is legally defined as “someone born biologically female” as reported by Brian Melley, Jill Lawless and Sylvis Hui of the Associated Press via TheHill.com.

But hold on a sec… for a nation that looks the other way when pro-terrorist rioters literally burn parts of Britain to the ground, but arrests conservatives for silently praying outside of abortuaries, it’s a legitimate question to ask WHY the UKSC just made this very conservative-friendly ruling.

I really didn’t have to dig all that hard to find out the true reason.

But first, I’m compelled by the rules of fairness to point out that the UKSC isn’t the same as our SCOTUS. Our SCOTUS certainly isn’t subject to our House of Representatives. But the UKSC, not so much.

Church of England’s first ‘non-binary’ vicar, Bingo Allison.

As noted by Jack Simson Caird (a Senior Research Fellow in Parliaments and the Rule of Law at the Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law), published by UKConstitutionalLaw.org (emphasis mine);

The Westminster [Parliament] view, I would argue, is based on the notion that the UK constitution is based on a number of constitutional principles that ensure that Parliament is ‘the senior partner’.

Mr. Caird further stated;

Judicial review, parliamentary sovereignty, parliamentary accountability, the power to prorogue [postpone] and parliamentary privilege should all be interpreted so as to give effect to Parliament’s role as the principal check on the Government’s power.

Now that we’re all at least familiar on where exactly the UKSC is in the pecking order, what was the catalyst for the UKSC even hearing this case?

Simple. Woke-ism went full circle and now has started eating itself.

In the same article I cited (above) from TheHill.com (emphasis mine);

The U.K. case stems from a 2018 law passed by the Scottish Parliament saying 50% of the membership of the boards of Scottish public bodies should be women. Transgender women with gender recognition certificates were to be included in meeting the quota.

You just can’t make stuff like this up.