Welcome to Nazi Britain; English Cops Investigating 9-Year-Old Children for ‘Hate Crimes’; 3-Year-Old for ‘Intimidation’

Papers… show me your papers.

Willkommen im faschistischen Großbritannien…

Is it too late for Britain to save itself from their slow-motion national suicide? Just me, but until they elect someone like Nigel Farage or Tommy Robinson, it’s only a matter of time until they change the name of the country something like Britanniastan or the United Caliphate.

In just the handful of recent months, an unidentified woman was arrested for silently praying on a public sidewalk in front of an abortuary. No screaming, no trespassing. Just standing on public property and silently praying.

I’ve also come to find out that police in England and Wales strip search a child every 19 hours. Coming as a shock to no one, two countries with the roughly same population as California and Florida might have to answer for their cops strip searching children at such an alarming rate.

When will British cops start arresting truly dangerous people?

These two examples are just the first ones that came to mind.

You can rest assured that the examples of the gutlessness and pettiness of the British cops are readily available for those willing to do just the minimum of internet detective work.

But as they say on the infomercials, “But wait… there’s more.”

Even though the UK is quickly becoming known as the planet’s premier woke dung heap, the powers-to-be have somehow managed to descend even deeper into the filth.

Stunning as it may seem, Britain is back in the headlines — this time, for investigating children as young as nine for ‘hate speech’.

As reported by The Standard news agency of London, UK (emphasis mine);

Primary school pupil who called classmate a ‘retard’ among children investigated by police

A nine-year-old who called a primary school classmate a “retard” is among thousands of people investigated by police for non-crime hate incidents, according to reports.

Forces also recorded a row where two secondary schoolgirls who said that another pupil smelt “like fish”.

They were among several cases of children being logged as having committed NCHIs, according to Freedom of Information requests to police by The Times.

Menace II Society.

Government guidance says that such incidents are supposed to be recorded for incidents “clearly motivated by intentional hostility” and where there is a real risk of escalation “causing significant harm or a criminal offence”.

But here’s the $64,000 question; just how long does someone officially tagged by Big Brother of having committed a NCHIs, how long does this particular crime/non-crime stick with you?

Researching the official College of Policing website, I came upon a section entitled, Authorised Professional Practice Recording and retention of non-crime hate incidents.

Admittedly, I don’t do police-speak. So if I screw up the interpretation, someone please square me away with the straight scoop. It was on page 20 that I found out some rather disturbing news.

Cited herein (emphasis mine);

Step five – retention of police information

Officers and staff must retain, review and dispose of records,
including personal data, in line with all relevant legislative and
regulatory requirements. This includes, but is not limited to:

  • Management of Police Information (MoPI) Code of Practice 2005
  • UK General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Data Protection Act (DPA) 2018
  • The Human Rights Act 1998

The maximum period for retention prior to review is six years.
See also Management of police information.

Here’s what I’m not quote understanding — does this crime/not a crime remain shackled to the individual for a maximum of six years; or does this mean that the police can sit on this for a maximum of six years, review the charges, find out you’ve had too much to think, then put you back on tenterhooks for another six years?

Conceivably for the rest of their lives??

All I’m really sure of, when Arab-Muslims residing in Britain bark, the British cops quake in their boots. It’s fairly obvious who really controls things in the once-Great Britain.

One last example: As reported by The Mirror of London (emphasis mine);

Nation-wide BOLO: Isabel (7), Ellie-Louise (4) and neighbor Caidence (3). Wanted for “slightly intimidating behavior”.

Jobsworth cops have written to the parents of three young girls after complaints about them playing outside their homes.

Ellie-Louise Cox, four, sister Isabel, seven, and three-year-old neighbour Caidence Leadbetter were accused of “slightly intimidating behaviour”.

Their parents received a letter from police stating the youngsters could face action after locals complained of damaged trees and plants.

The letters, from a police community support officer, was delivered to the families’ homes in Smiths Wood, Birmingham, last week.

It stated elderly locals had complained of “minor damage” to trees, the “trampling of plants” and “slightly intimidating behaviour”.