Killer Clarence crushes it…
I hate wonk, you hate wonk, we all hate wonk. Sadly, sometimes we have to wade through the wonk to understanding exactly what’s going on.
I’ll keep it to a minimum, I promise.
There’s a certain office in the federal government known as the Solicitor General. Long story short, the Solicitor General represents the US Government in most cases heard at the SCOTUS.
Our current Solicitor General, D. John Sauer, was just at the Supreme Court arguing if any given federal judge’s ruling constituted a “universal injunction.”
In other words, if a federal judge… any federal judge, be they from Portland, Maine, or the US Territory of Guam, if that ruling overrides any given presidential administration’s federal policies.
As reported by PJmedia.com; (emphasis mine)
“We believe that the best reading of that is what you said in Trump against Hawaii, which is that Wirtz in 1963 was really the first universal injunction,” Sauer told the Court.
That’s when Justice Thomas stepped in and cut through the legal weeds with a devastatingly simple observation.
“So we survived until the 1960s without universal injunction?” he asked.
Sauer didn’t hesitate: “That’s exactly correct. And in fact, those were very limited, very rare, even in the 1960s.”
Everything’s coming up Trump! When he wins this case in the Supreme Court, the left are going to literally lose their shit.
Remember who the Chairman was?