Isn’t it interesting that the guy who leads the GOP polls, the Biden Crime Family wants to jail him, and when it comes to the No. 2 Democrat, Team Biden wants to totally discredit him?
“Despite the informal scientific consensus around the safety of immortalized cells, there just aren’t any long-term health studies to prove it.”
Fassler dances around what exactly immortalized cells are for a few paragraphs, then tip-toes ever so gingerly telling us exactly what they are;
That’s where immortalized cells come in. They’ve been used in medical research since the early 1950s, when the first and most famous immortal cell line—derived from the cervical cancer cells of a woman named Henrietta Lacks—was successfully grown in a lab. Lacks is widely viewed as a victim of failed medical ethics and systemic racism; her cells, which have gone on to generate billions of dollars in economic value, were taken without her knowledge or permission.
Blah, blah, blah… yadda, yadda, yadda. Then Fassler conveniently blows through telling us everything;
They’ve also saved lives. The so-called HeLa line of cells first enabled researchers to continue study without fresh samples from living humans or animals, leading to breakthrough discoveries in oncological and immunological science. Today, AstraZeneca Plc and J&J’s Covid-19 vaccines are grown using immortalized human kidney and retinal cells, respectively. The process is a lot like making cultured meat. Immortal cells are grown in a big steel drum called a bioreactor, ultimately generating thousands of pounds of cell mass.
But wait. Did Fassler say if the immortalized human kidney and retinal cells were cancerous or not?
Joe, what exactly were the starter cells used in that “big steel drum called a bioreactor”? He certainly has implied that the only “immortalized cells” are cancer cells.
This is where it starts to give you the heebie-jeebies;
“The leading startups, for their part, are pressing ahead, nodding to their potential vulnerability with the occasional creepy waiver. At Upside’s facility in Emeryville, California, where the company spends weeks at a time growing poultry cells in drums, investors and pesky reporters tasting a cooked version of the final product have been asked to first acknowledge the lack of long-term health data. “The cultured meat and related food products in the Tasting are experimental,” the company’s waiver reads. “The properties are not completely known.”
Now it really gets uber-heebie-jeebie;
“And yet “cancer” is a terrifying word. How can the makers of cultured meat prove to regulators and skeptics that there’s nothing to worry about? “The best way is to give it to people and then ask them 20 years later or 30 years later, ‘Has any of you gotten cancer at a higher-than-normal rate?’ ” says Robert Weinberg [of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. “But that’s not a practical experiment.”
Folks, just as soon as the Biden Administration and the AP gave this their official seal of approval, the “practical experiment” just began.
“Cow’s milk turned out to be a popular symbol for white supremacy” – NPO 3, government-funded Dutch news station.
As I recently posted, 27-year-old Eva Vlaadingerbroek has emerged as quite the populist voice in the Netherlands. It goes without saying that the leftist Dutch government hates everything about her and everything she stands for.
As seen in the somewhat dated tweet below, Vlaadingerbroek was hammered by a government media network, insinuating that she was posing with a few bottles of white milk… supposedly a dog-whistle for right-wing extremists;
???????? “Cow milk is a beloved symbol of white supremacy”, according to the Dutch state funded media.
So basically they’re using my taxes to call me a white supremacist and a figure head for the far right for posting a photo holding milk. Nice. https://t.co/CpOAHPtMUP
Eva “The Milkmaid” Vlaadingerbroek. Isn’t she scary?
The Dutch government’s tweet links to an article from the state-funded NPO 3 TV network’s article that clearly states;
“Cow’s milk turned out to be a popular symbol for white supremacy, the belief that white people are superior to others and must dominate them.”
But wait… there’s more.
The government’s schill, NPO 3 (Nederlandse Publieke Omroep drie), goes on to say (with a straight face); Emphasis mine
The choice of milk as a racist symbol does not come out of the blue. According to Willem Wagenaar, who conducts research for the Anne Frank House into right-wing extremism, drinking milk expresses the idea of a collective, white connectedness. “People of European descent talk about the generally more likely to have a physical tolerance to lactose than people with another background,” he explains. “That fact is used to describe the us-them thinking, that is a central theme within the ideology.”
The peculiar pride of being able to dairy; Digestion has a long history, according to scientific research. In the first decades of the last century, a period when many Westerners were fascinated by eugenics or ‘race improvement’, the lactose intolerance of certain population groups was already cited to demonstrate their alleged inferiority. Thus, East Asians were derogatorily referred to as “rice eaters” who are said to be weak and feminine due to their lack of meat and dairy consumption.
“I am not afraid, for God is with me. I was born for this!”
Today is the Feast Day of St. Joan of Arc and therefore my first Name Day as a Catholic. ????????✝️ pic.twitter.com/giyet7TGGx
Now that the Biden Administration has decided to declare war on the American farmers, I’d like to reiterate what I said to the American people during an interview with @NTDNews last summer: